Drawing off the idea of the CAPTCHA, the NEXTCHA asks learners to answer a question before proceeding through an activity. I like the idea, but I don’t know that I’d implement it on every slide of a presentation. It seems to be an excellent way to engage learners and to make sure that they comprehend critical elements of the lesson before progressing to more complex concepts.
When you get your taxes done, do you really care whether or not your accountant has ever dissected a cat?
It’s late and I’m thinking. Never a good combination, I suppose, but this has been running through my mind a lot since a session yesterday on the fully online lab science courses created and offered by SinclairOnline.
After the presentation, the discussion turned to the question of whether or not a fully online lab science course is TRULY equivalent to a face-to-face lab. One person brought up the fact that no one would want to have a doctor who had only completed online science courses, and I would have to agree. When I go to a surgeon, I trust that this individual has done a lot of work on a lot of real live bodies before he/she took the scalpel to my flesh.
But this misses the point. No one is suggesting the development of a fully-online medical school. No one is suggesting that real hands-on experience in a science lab should not be required for students who intend on working in scientific fields upon graduation. However, for students who are majoring in subjects such as HRIM (Hotel, Restaurant, and Institutional Management), Aviation, Dance or Digital Media Production (to name a few), why should such an emphasis be placed on the use of a real scalpel to cut the real flesh of a real dead cat. Of what practical use will the hands-on examination of blood cells through a real microscope be to a student whose goal is be an historian?
Students who major in biology, chemistry, physics, nursing, and funeral service will have ample opportunities to get their hands dirty in a lab, and should, by all means, take as many hands-on traditional lab science courses as possible. And in an ideal world, it would be wonderful if ALL students had the opportunity to participate and experience a full traditional lab science course.
But we don’t live in an ideal world.
Lab space is at a premium.
Budgets have been slashed.
We can’t hire more teachers.
We can’t build more science labs.
We can’t buy more equipment.
More than ever, community colleges are being asked to do more with less.
This is where the online lab science course is MOST needed. With the online lab science course, students cover the same material, complete the same assignments, and meet the same outcomes. The delivery method is different, yes. But the end result remains the same. Students learn the same concepts. No, they don’t get to handle scalpels. No, they don’t get to smell the formaldehyde. But they DO get to master the concepts and understand the critical elements of the course.
By providing online lab science options to students, we free up valuable lab space for students who are pursuing degrees in the “hard sciences”.
Just my late night thoughts….
Comments, questions, concerns or (gentle) criticisms are always welcome.
In 2006, Sinclair began work on fully online degrees, which brings up the big challenge… How do you teach science online? After much internal discussion, they began to develop a fully online Astronomy Lab course. Using a team of faculty, Instructional designer, graphic designers, and flash developers, they created all the course content from scratch.
The course is housed in ANGEL, and includes text and multimedia elements to deliver instruction and assessments. As always, the most difficult part of creating an online science lab course is making certain that the lab sessions are equivalent, regardless of delivery method.
Established six standards for online labs, to make certain that onlinelabs are equivalent to face to face labs. Online labs must be:
- Clear instructions
- Platform Independent
- Meets Learning Objectives
Engaging Online Astronomy Students
Received a grant to explore possibility of putting lab online. Initially put materials online for face-to-face students to explore before developing and launching fully online version. Face to face students were impressed by online resources and their feedback encouraged faculty to move forward with development. Course Materials include step-by-step video instructions which demonstrate how students are to complete labs and interactive flash-based activities which students complete to meet learning objectives. In some cases, the web-based versions were easier for student to use and helped foster greater comprehension of course material. Outside publisher resources were employed to further enhance course materials where it was not feasible for the college to produce the materials in-house. Utilized 4 team fishbowl discussion forums. Fishbowl forums allow teams to post to each other and allow non-team members to view other teams’ observations but not respond inside of forum.
Immersing Online Students in Biology
As programs expanded, online Anatomy and Physiology course was needed. Online class mirrors face to face outcomes, objectives, and tests. “Articulation lab” has students open a virtual box of bones and assemble the structures as indicated. Provides direct and instant feedback to students, and assesses their knowledge of material. Also developed Android app “Skeletal Lab” for articulation exercises. “Blood Smear Lab” reproduces blood smear activities as done in class. Students perform all adjustments on virtual microscope to get blood cells into focus. Cells contain pop-ups which describe individual formed elements. Also contains a fetal pig dissection with video of real live dead pig dissection and then flash activities where students virtually dissect a pig and review various parts.
And the question comes up… Is the online lab equivalent to the traditional lab? In my mind, it depends.
What are the course objectives?
How will the course impact the students in later classes?
But this is something that will require deeper consideration and much greater analysis…
I’m a bit of an introvert and I very rarely promote myself or any of my endeavors. For instance, I’m in a band and always feel guilty when I send out Facebook invitations to my friends each time we schedule a gig. However, I feel compelled to mention this because I’m just so excited about it.
Each year, the League for Innovation in the Community College hosts an annual conference. This year, the conference, Innovations 2013, (Twitter: @InnovationsConf or search #INND13) is being held from March 10-13 at the Hilton Anatole in Dallas, TX. I mention this because at this conference, Prof. Ellen Genovesi and I are presenting on our experience in the design, development, execution and support of a fully-online lab science course (Human Anatomy). The session, which we’ve lovingly titled “Biology Lab in Your Pajamas! The Fully Online Lab Science Course“, will be presented on March 12 from 2:30 to 3:30. This is my first time presenting at a national conference, so I’m incredibly excited about the opportunity.
Prof. Ellen Genovesi (the content expert), and I (the instructional technology geek) have planned an entertaining and informative session in which we’ll discuss every aspect of the process, from the initial course proposal all the way through to the feedback we received from students who’ve completed the course. If you’re an instructional technology kind of person or a science faculty member or just someone who wants to see how a lab science course can be taught online, this session will provide some insight from a couple of folks who’ve seen the process all the way through and lived to tell about it.
Oh, and as an extra added bonus, we will be wearing pajamas for this presentation. Seriously.
That’s it for my plug.
Hope to see you in Dallas,
I hate to write something that says nothing, but that’s pretty much what I’m doing now…
A lot of the things I do just can’t be done in the cloud (yet). Today was one of those days where the Life in the Cloud experiment went well simply because there is no way to do perform some of my work in the cloud. I require too many specialized applications and too much dedicated local processing power.
So on one hand, day 2 of the experiment could be considered an utter failure because I couldn’t do most of my work in the cloud. But on the other hand, it was a great success because everything that could be done in the cloud came easily and I encountered no stumbling blocks along the way.
Tomorrow, however, is another day with its own unique set of challenges. We shall see…
So the first day of my 30 day experiment has come to a close. Overall, it was a success. However, the first thing I’ve realized is that I do a lot more in a day than I think I do, and I use a lot more tools than I realize. On the list I posted yesterday, I forgot about the amount of audio file conversions I perform. I often receive files in .WAV or .WMA format which must be converted to a .MP3 format in order to optimize them for web delivery, and today, I received a batch of such files. What to do???
My first thought was to use zamzar.com for the audio conversions, but the problem with Zamzar is that I can only upload one file at a time, and it kicks out links to individual files which must be downloaded separately. Although a relatively simple solution, it isn’t really the most efficient or effective way to do things. So I did a little bit of research and discovered convertaudioonline.com. I tend to steer away from tools with such obvious names because of all the Malware and other such nastiness I’ve encountered over the years. But lo and behold, convertaudioonline.com did exactly what it promised, quickly, efficiently, and without infecting my workstation. I was able to batch process the audio files and download them as a single file. Who could ask for more? So, instead of using my usual audio conversion tools, I was able to do the file conversions on the web without touching the lavafloor. (See yesterday’s entry for an explanation on the lavafloor concept).
I also had to take a single MS Word document and break it up into several smaller PDF files. I almost touched the lavafloor on this one, but somehow managed to keep my limbs inside the ride at all times by using Microsoft Web Apps. I loaded the .DOCX file into the MS Word Web app and started working on it, but the problem is that the Word web app doesn’t allow you to open up multiple documents at the same time. So, instead of copying and pasting the text from one document into another and saving the resultant files as .PDF documents, I had to cut out only what I wanted from the document, save it as a .PDF, restore the deleted text, then repeat the process for each new document I was creating. Not much more time or labor consuming than what I would have done, but still not the ideal solution.
As the title of this post indicates, I did get slightly singed today and wound up opening a desktop application, but not for long. So rather than actually burning myself on the lavafloor, I only singed myself a little. After thinking about it, I realized that I could have performed the operation in the cloud, but I was in a bit of a rush and didn’t think about it. So what was the application and what was the purpose?? I had to resize an image. Had I been thinking, I could have easily uploaded the image into Pixlr or the Photoshop.com app and resized it. But I didn’t. I opened up Paint, resized the image, saved it, and went on about my business. So, this was a misstep onto the lavafloor. It wasn’t caused by any limitations of the cloud, it happened because I’m so used to doing things in a certain way, and I’m still getting used to the experiment.
Final rating for the day? On a scale of 1 to 10 (1 being a complete failure and 10 being a total success), the cloud gets an overall rating of 10, and I get an overall rating of 9. Not too shabby for a beginning. But I do things which are much more complex than this… Let’s see where it goes from here.
When I was a kid, I used to play this game called “the floor is made of lava.” Perhaps you’ve heard of it. Maybe you’ve even played it yourself. For the uninitiated, the rules go something like this. The hardwood floor (or shag carpet or linoleum tile or whatever) is made of lava. Your mission is to navigate the room without touching the lavafloor. You can climb on the shelves, the desk, the dresser, the bed, the TV or any other furniture, as long as you don’t touch the floor. You can even stand on your shoes if your shoes are on the lavafloor, but you can’t touch the lavafloor yourself. If you drop something and it hits the lavafloor, then you can’t pick it up because it’s in the lava. If you, yourself, touch the lavafloor, then you have 3 seconds to get off of the lavafloor or else the game is over.
Um… ok. How does that relate to instructional technology?
I’ve decided to undertake an experiment and will be documenting the process here. The experiment is this… for the next 30 days, the floor will be made of lava. I will not use any desktop applications other than my web browsers, Spotify, and a couple of internal applications that we use here for which there are no web-based alternatives. I’ll be working exclusively in the cloud and documenting the successes and failures of my journey. Think of it as the “floor is made of lava” game for grown-ups. I’m sure I’ll touch the floor on occasion, but so long as I don’t abandon the mission altogether, then I’ll be safe and I’ll just have made a misstep.
Why am I doing this?
My reasoning is twofold. First, I’m trying to see just how well our students would be able to perform in a fully web-based environment. If they were to take an online course with us and didn’t have access to any additional software, would they be able to succeed? Second, I’m trying to envision the office work of the future. Our job is to educate our students and prepare them for the “real world.” What will the “real world” be like in 2 years? Will we still be using big productivity suites or will we be more reliant on web-based apps which can be accessed from any device without relying on operating system specific software. I’m trying to see if I can function in the “OS agnostic” world of the web.
What tools I’m using (for now)
There are scads of tools that can be used for this experiment, but here’s the list I’m starting out with… I’m sure it will expand as the experiment progresses, but here’s how I’m starting.
Web Browsers: Google Chrome, Firefox
File Storage: Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft Skydrive, Apple iCloud
Productivity Suite: Google Docs, Microsoft Office Webapps
Image Editor: Pixlr
Screen Capture: Pixlr Grabber
Text Editor: Drive Notepad (Chrome app)
Instant Messenger: imo.im (Chrome app)
Additional Presentations: Prezi
FTP Client: FireFTP (Firefox add-on)
Stay tuned for tomorrow’s post to see how (and if) I survived day one of the experiment…
As always, any questions, comments, concerns, or (gentle) criticisms are always welcome.